Terrorism---criminal justice Coursework Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words - 1

Terrorism---criminal justice - Coursework Example The conversation on this topic has largely been avoided and there is little understanding among the public on this issue. Amimut refers to the Israel official policy of concealing information on nuclear weapons adopted in 1969 in the Nixon-Meir deal. Amimiut is a Hebrew term that means ambiguity or opacity. Amimut evolved out of various decisions that were continuously implemented due to strategic and political needs of the country. In the mid 1970s Shalhevveth Freier and the team of Israel Atomic Energy Commission (IAEC) formed the rules of the national doctrine on nuclear policy. The reasons for the country’s possession of nuclear were varied. Some leaders were of the opinion that the country’s possession of nuclear is a symbol of the country having a weapon of last result. Other leaders were of the opinion that Israel should not be the first country in the Middle East to be in possession of nuclear. During the Six-Day War, the then chief of Mossad, General Meir Amit was of the opinion that if Israel had nuclear weapons, this would act as an incentive for Soviet Union to supply Egypt wi th nuclear weapons. After an accident that occurred in Dimona complex in 1966 that left one person dead, the then Prime Minister of Israel Eshkol was shaken about the nuclear project and was of the opinion American diplomacy could be a better method. However, after heavy casualties that Israel suffered in the Six-Day War he changed his mind and supported the idea of the country creating a weapon and testing it in the desert so as to demonstrate the country’s nuclear capability (Cohen, A., 2013). Israel was also forced to make a stance of not been a signatory to the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT). This stance was because NPT was against the countries acquired nuclear capabilities. NPT also lacked adequate guarantees against protection by nuclear possessing countries such as the Soviet Union. Despite the heavy thought of the

Non Case Study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words

Non - Case Study Example Mary and Sally fulfilled the terms laid out on the contract with regards to the payment of purchase price clause. The Purchaser was to pay monthly installments on the first day of every month. Up to the point of Mary contacting the Seller on the need to terminate the contract, the Purchaser had made all payments as laid out up to that point. The purchaser has fulfilled all her contract negotiations. John, the Seller, violated the building code of the city. Sally fell down the stairs to the basement and the lack of the railings might have aggravated the situation. John had a duty to comply with the terms laid out on the building code and failure to do this is a tort which the specific element being failure to practice a duty (Schlanger& Spaulding, 1). John, being the seller in the contract also breached the terms of the contract which is also a tort (Schlanger& Spaulding, 1). The contract specifically mentioned that the Purchaser can terminate the contract during the first five years if no longer able to live due to a need to move to a nursing home. Sally is a Purchaser and she has a need to move to a nursing home. Mary notified John the need and even offered the doctor’s letter as proof. John forcing Mary to pay for an extra month was wrong. Mary is therefore in a position to take John to court on accounts of breach of contract and on negligence of duty (Schlanger& Spaul ding, 1). The only additional information required would be the contract the Seller and the Purchaser signed did not clearly indicate the period which the Purchaser need to give the notice to the Seller with regards to the termination. This is a crucial piece of information that is missing. On signing the M & S contract, John as the Seller and Mary and Sally as the Purchasers agreed to the terms set out on the contract. John needs to understand that the terms on the contract are binding. Mary is acting within her rights by notifying John on her need

Amplitude Equations Using Pendulums

Amplitude Equations Using Pendulums

Skill and Craftsmanship in the Works of Steinbeck Essay -- Biography B

Skill and Craftsmanship in the Works of Steinbeck      Ã‚  Ã‚   Throughout Cannery Row, Of Mice and Men, The Red Pony and The Grapes of Wrath, John Steinbeck professes his admiration for the man who displays skill and craftsmanship in his work. A man who does his job exceedingly well is, by extension in Steinbeck's works, a hero who is satisfied in doing his best in affection for his craft - a direct contrast to the multitude of humans who are merely unsuccessful and unhappy dreamers.   Ã‚  Ã‚   The emphasis of skill and craftsmanship is particularly evident in a description of Slim in Of Mice and Men: He moved with a majesty only achieved by royalty and master craftsmen.   He was a jerkline skinner, capable of driving ten, sixteen, even twenty mules with a single line to the leaders.   He was capable of killing a fly on a wheeler's butt with a whip without touching the mule. (97)   Ã‚  Ã‚   Steinbeck makes it clear that the professional prowess of this man is to be equated with his authority, understanding, and compassion. Slim is, for example, the only man who tries to comfort George at the end of the novel when his companion, Lennie dies. When Steinbeck describes Slim as a person whose "authority was so great that his word was taken on any subject, be it politics or love" (98), Warren French notes that Steinbeck "breaks his editorial silence...to make it absolutely clear how Slim is to be regarded" (78).   Clearly, Steinbeck regards Slim's morally upstanding character highly enough to consider it prudent to describe outright his feelings toward him. In regard to the other characters, he had been satisfied to let an objective description and an account of each character's actions stand on their own merit.   On a similar note, Bil... ... these character's - Slim's, Billy Buck's, Doc's, and Casy's- tremendous will to achieve the human ideal. Works Cited French, Warren.   John Steinbeck.   New York: Twayne, 1961. . ----------   John Steinbeck.   Boston: Twayne, 1975. Heiney, Donald W.   Essentials of Contemporary Literature.  New York:  Barron's, 1958. Lisca, Peter.   The Wide World of John Steinbeck.   New Brunswick, New  Jersey: Rutgers  Ã‚   University,1958. Mintner, David.   "The Fate of Writing during the Great Depression".   A Cultural History Of the American Novel. http://ocean.st.usm.edu/ ~wsimkins/minter.html>. 19 June 1997.   (5 May 1999). Steinbeck, John.   Cannery Row.   New York: Bantam, 1945. ----------  Ã‚   The Grapes of Wrath.   New York:   Compass, 1958. ----------.   Of Mice and Men.   New York: Bantam, 1955. ----------.   The Red Pony.   New York: Bantam, 1948.

Common Size Financial Statement Analysis Essay

When all the items of a financial statement are expressed on a common basis, it is known as a common-size financial statement. Common-sizing of balance sheet is done generally by expressing its all items as a percentage of its total assets or total equities. Similarly, income statement is common-sized when its all items are expressed as percentage of total sales. PROCEDURE OF COMMON SIZING In preparing common-size income statement, the following procedure is to be followed : †¢Total sales revenue or total revenue is taken as hundred. †¢Each item of cost or expenses is represented as a percentage of total revenue. †¢Profit or loss also shown as a percentage of revenue. Similarly, balance sheet is common-sized as follows : †¢Total of assets side or total of liability side is taken as hundred. †¢Each item of asset is expressed as percentage of total asset total of capital and liabilities. †¢Each item of the liability side is also expressed as a percentage of total assets or total of capital and liabilities. USEFULNESS OF COMMON-SIZE FINANCIAL STATEMENT ANALYSIS †¢Inter-firm comparison becomes more meaningful when financial statement of the firms under comparison is common-sized. †¢Common-size financial statement analysis is most suitable to evaluate the performance of a company over a period of time. †¢It is useful in understanding the relative importance of different sources of financing. †¢It helps the analyst to formulate hypothesis about the most efficient business model by means of effective inter-firm comparisons. †¢Common-size financial analysis can be used to compare a company’s financial data with industry norms or average. COMMON-SIZE FINANCIAL STATEMENT ANALYSIS When all the items of a financial statement are expressed on a common basis, it is known as a common-size financial statement. Common-sizing of balance sheet is done generally by expressing its all items as a percentage of its total assets or total equities. Similarly, income statement is common-sized when its all items are expressed as percentage of total sales. PROCEDURE OF COMMON SIZING In preparing common-size income statement, the following procedure is to be followed : †¢Total sales revenue or total revenue is taken as hundred. †¢Each item of cost or expenses is represented as a percentage of total revenue. †¢Profit or loss also shown as a percentage of revenue. Similarly, balance sheet is common-sized as follows : †¢Total of assets side or total of liability side is taken as hundred. †¢Each item of asset is expressed as percentage of total asset total of capital and liabilities. †¢Each item of the liability side is also expressed as a percentage of total assets or total of capital and liabilities. USEFULNESS OF COMMON-SIZE FINANCIAL STATEMENT ANALYSIS †¢Inter-firm comparison becomes more meaningful when financial statement of the firms under comparison is common-sized. †¢Common-size financial statement analysis is most suitable to evaluate the performance of a company over a period of time. †¢It is useful in understanding the relative importance of different sources of financing. †¢It helps the analyst to formulate hypothesis about the most efficient business model by means of effective inter-firm comparisons. †¢Common-size financial analysis can be used to compare a company’s financial data with industry norms or average.

Touching The Void Argumentative essay

Yates made a wild decision to climb Saul Grandee a mountain in Peru. Simon and Joe were determined to be the first team ever to successfully climb the west face of Saul Grandee. When successfully reaching the peak of the mountain, they climbed down via the north ridge, and that's when trouble took take its place. Joe slipped and broke his leg, leaving Simon with no choice but to slowly reel Joe down the snowy mountain, worse came to worse and Joe was hanging over a cliff with only a rope holding him and Simon together.Simon had to make a rosaceous decision, cut the rope and save himself, or stay tied toes and both of them be pulled to their deaths. Some say Simon made the wrong decision by cutting the rope, but when In a life or death situation, makes cutting the rope the only option. Cutting the rope Is a huge rule In the climbing community and Simon was given a lot of grief when returning from Mount Usual Grandee for cutting the rope. Simon was In a life or death situation, and tho ught that on the end of that rope was a dead, lifeless body: he seriously believed that Joe was dead.Making that traumatic session to cut the rope, Simon was through a lot of emotions and was well aware of the consequences. He could either have them both fall to their death or have one get out alive. Simony's decision was the right one to make, not only because they both got out alive but because it was valid, he believed Joe was dead. One is better than none! When in a life or death situation, first instincts is the way to go. Simon expressed in the Touching the Void documentary that he believed Joe was dead and if he were to cut the rope there was still a chance of him surviving.Cutting the rope was clearly he best decision to make because if Simon didn't cut the rope he would have fallen to his death and there was no chance of Simon or Joe to survive. Simon believed that if he were to cut the rope he could climb back down the mountain and get help to possibly save Joe. This meant there was still a chance of them both surviving. Adrenaline is trustworthy, as well as life or death situation instincts, Simon had faith in his decisions and so should everyone else.Simon believed that Joe was dead, even if he weren't Simon knew that Joe had a broken leg, and if he left more time to let him limb up the rope, he would have had to help him down the mountain anyway. Selfish, yes, but there is no such thing as selfishness when you're in a life or death situation. Simon cutting the rope conquered his uncertainty of Joe being alive or not. Lucky for them both they both survived this traumatic disaster, which again expresses cutting the rope was the right choice to settle with.Cutting the rope was the right decision to make and I fully support Simony's courageous decision as though I were In the situation myself I'd have followed the same decisions, because your own fife Is the most beautiful thing you could ever have and If you had any chance of living another day of It , you most certainly would, wouldn't you? Touching The Void Argumentative essay By reanalyzes courageous decision, cut the rope and save himself, or stay tied to Joe and both of them be pulled to their deaths. Some say Simon made the wrong decision by cutting the rope, but when in a life or death situation, makes cutting the rope the only option.Cutting the rope is a huge rule in the climbing community and Simon was even a lot of grief when returning from Mount Saul Grandee for cutting the rope. Simon was in a life or death situation, and thought that on the end of that rope was a dead, lifeless body; he seriously believed that Joe was dead. Making that traumatic if he weren't Simon knew that Joe had a broken leg, and if he left more time to let him I were in the situation myself I'd have followed the same decisions, because your own life is the most beautiful thing you could ever have and if you had any chance of living another day of it, you most certainly would, wouldn't you?